Reading time: about 5 minutes
The day Stray Kids was set to headline Governors Ball was the same day the festival itself was bound to meet the same fate as last year. By the evening, the possibility of weather-related changes hung in the air: a thunderstorm threatened the evening’s most anticipated performance. The resulting change was annoying to some, fortunate to many: Stray Kids’ set was moved to earlier in the evening, swallowing other artists with slots before them.
While some of the festivalgoers were disappointed, the majority, as was clear from the crowd in front of the main stage, would have caused greater havoc in the case of any alternate outcome. Entering even the VIP viewing section was a dramatic experience. The density of the human sea exceeded any reasonable expectation — and rose even further if one takes into consideration the ever-present faces of handsome Korean men plastered all over the fans’ belongings, bodies and hairstyles for decorative purposes. It was, admittedly, a foreign sight to many music fans outside the K-Pop niche. While a bedroom poster can be a rite of passage for a teenage boy band fan, hair clips with Gerard Way’s face on them never became a mainstream fashion statement for the My Chemical Romance fans.
A couple of months later on the other side of the U.S., another music-relevant entity imposed some order on the spectacle: The Grammys rolled out a few new categories, including one titled the “Best Asian Pop Music Performance.” Mild backlash followed, with BTS, the titans of K-Pop themselves, refusing to submit any of their music to the 2027 edition of the awards. Their message is simple: they want their music to be enjoyed and recognized on its own merits, not within the deceptive safety of a narrow racial or geographic category.
Yet the mechanism for this inclusion is not entirely unlike the one governing the terms on which an average fan of this specific genre comes to relate to their idols. Teenagers and women in their mid-50s, surrounded by children and spouses on a festival lawn in Queens, were equally enthusiastic about a phone case bearing Felix’s face. But there is a sense of othering concealed in the adoration: a sense that a beloved musician, however talented, is part human, part collectible trinket. In both cases, an artist can be recognized and even celebrated, but never become culturally unmarked.
The industry itself hardly resists turning its stars into rare Pokémon cards. Quite the opposite: the idol as commodity sells well. K-Pop arrives not just as a music category, but also as a successful effort at monetizing fantasy. Collectible photocards populating album bundles are styled as Polaroids; many of them are selfies rather than professionally taken photos. A mere stylistic choice produces an illusion of personal connection, feeding into the modern parasocial excitement. In an era where we know increasingly more about the people we admire yet have no direct connection to, a souvenir shaped like something made just for the specific consumer’s enjoyment breaks the fourth wall and reaches right through it. The surprisingly restrictive terms of some artists’ contracts feed into the same logic: boundaries surrounding dating publicly or overall, expressing uncensored opinions on political issues or displaying behaviors deemed incompatible with an idol’s image are aimed at keeping the fantasy pristine.
The final product is therefore somewhat bizarre. K-Pop artists have amassed enormous international fanbases and achieved extraordinary success at remarkably young ages — some of the contemporary scene’s veterans have barely entered their thirties. Yet they remain persistently framed as a phenomenon, a spectacle or a cultural fascination, with the industry itself offering little resistance: Why would the label be unhappy if fascination is so profitable? BTS’s refusal to submit their work for Grammy consideration, however, rejects the institutional conclusion. The band is not content to remain being treated as adjacent to pop music instead of as a participant. But popularity should not demand pigeonholing, nor should serious recognition require artists to shed the cultural specificity and creative conventions that brought them that popularity. The problem is not inherently with K-Pop being recognizably Korean, and it’s not necessarily with a fan wanting Felix’s face on their phone case, either. An issue emerges when difference becomes a condition of admission, leaving musicians with limited ability to enter the mainstream as anything other than idols or imports.
Back at Governors Ball, Stray Kids delivered a world-class performance. They did not appear to need a separate category and did not draw an exclusively K-Pop-hungry crowd: they stood among the stars of a packed festival day, alongside Lorde and A$AP Rocky, and lit up Corona Park with pyrotechnics and choreography made only more impressive by the smoldering New York City heat. Through it all, they remain, importantly, simply artists. To recognize them as part of pop does not strip them of their cultural identity. It merely makes them more visible as what they have already earned the right to be: headliners.
Arina Zadvornaya is a graduate student in the Duffield College of Engineering. She is a columnist for the Arts & Culture department and can be reached at az499@cornell.edu.
The Darker Side of the Biopic Genre
The Museum Is Supposed to Hurt
